Dodge's Challenger SRT Demon Is an Infuriatingly Marketed From-the-Factory Dragster

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Dodge has been parsing out minor details on the Demon, slowly shaping its identity, for what seems like decades, when it has actually only been about a month. In today’s publicity sprig, Fiat Chrysler indicated that — unlike the Hellcat — the Demon will be strip-focused with a suspension setup specifically designed exclusively for straight-ahead speed.

With Dodge claiming that the Hellcat is the “ultimate do everything muscle car” with an intention “to strike that perfect balance between drag strip brute force, road course competence and street car civility,” I am left wondering just how streetable the Demon could possibly be. Like most purpose-built cars, dragsters are wonderful at doing exactly one thing and absolutely terrible at everything else. For Dodge’s new hype machine, the added forward momentum might come at the expense of hanging a right.

Converting the new car into a drag queen required FCA to equip the Demon with some fairly unique tuning characteristics. Dodge is bragging that the Demon the first factory mechanical/electronic drag-race-specific suspension setup ever implemented on a production car. My guess is because other companies probably knew better (and I’m genuinely torn between thinking this is a fun or terrible concept).

On the mechanical side of things, the car ups the compression on the rear Bilsteins and softens the front shocks while pairing them with more reactive springs. FCA opted for lower-rate stabilizer bars that still offer some lateral stability. It’s a fairly classic drag setup, optimizing load transfer and improving on-throttle traction. It should work well with the car’s fat Nitto NT05R drag radials.

Meanwhile, electronic wizardry can tweak the shocks’ rebound and compression from slightly firm to mushy and shift weight to the rear at launch, aiding traction. It can also completely disable traction control without abandoning its electronic stability control.

The only thing missing was a line-lock for warming the rear tires in the burnout box, but Dodge might have just omitted that bit. FCA says we would have to wait to find out the rest of the electronic trickery that occurs when an operator presses the new drag mode button and encourages everyone to watch the new Demon hype-video “multiple times” — which I find annoying. While I’m pleased to see some genuine information in this latest update, I’m more than a little tired of the stay-tuned marketing style the company is so fond of.

Someone should tell Dodge that beating a dead horse, even masterfully with a beautiful gilded club, is still beating a dead horse.

One glaring oddity in the announcement (and poorly hidden in the above photo) was the final result of “13.5=575@500” that the carmaker neglected to elaborate upon further. My best guess is that this is a hint of on-boost power in torque or horses at 500 wheel rotations per minute using some unspecified gearing. Someone who is better than I at math, who owns a decoder ring, and is willing to feed into Dodge’s twisted marketing plan, is welcome to speculate and convert this collection of numbers into something more meaningful.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 30 comments
  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Feb 24, 2017

    Can't wait to see the inevitable Youtube footage of two new Demons on a drag strip clowning into each other.

    • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Feb 25, 2017

      Screw YouTube. I'd pay good money to see that on pay-per-view after being assaulted for months by this nonstop marketing campaign.

  • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Feb 25, 2017

    A drinking buddy of mine traded his 6-speed SRT-392 Challenger for a 6-speed Challenger Hellcat roughly the day one arrived on the east coast. He has a remarkable interest in the Demon's specs, although he proclaims his disapprobation that the original Demon was a Dodge-badged A-body Duster rather than a high performance Challenger. Personally, I think a set of Yosemite Sam mudflaps would look as good as the 'Demon's fender flares. Rumor going around the bar tonight was that it will be a one-seater with small brakes to improve it's eighth mile time. Yippee.

  • SilverCoupe Tim, you don't always watch F1 as you don't want to lose sleep? But these races are great for putting one to sleep!I kid (sort of). I DVR them, I watch them, I fast forward a lot. It was great to see Lando win one, I've been a fan of McLaren since their heyday in CanAm in the late '60's.
  • Cprescott The problem with this fable by the FTC is:(1) shipping of all kinds was hindered at ports because of COVID related issues;(2) The President shafted the Saudis by insulting them with a fist bump that torqued them off to no end;(3) Saudis announced unilateral production cuts repeatedly during this President's tenure even as he begged to get them to produce more;(4) We were told that we had record domestic production so that would have lowered prices due to increased supply(5) The President emptied the strategic petroleum reserve to the lowest point since the 1980's due to number 3 and then sold much of that to China.We have repeatedly been told that documents and emails are Russian disinformation so why now are we to believe this?
  • Ollicat Another Biden attempt to say, "Look over there!"
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Who cares. Price of gas is not the issue. spending an extra 100$ a month over 4 tanks of gas is not the issue.this a political scam to distract really dumb people from the real issue. if rent and house payments were not up by 50% to as high as 150% higher in a ton of locations, then paying an extra 100$ in gas would be annoying but not really an issue. But the real-estate market with hedge fund investors, power-relator groups bought a ton of houses and flipped them into rentals and jacked up the rates uplifting the costs on everything else. and ironically no-one seems to be in any hurry to build more houses to bring those costs down because supply and demand means keeping less houses available to charge as much as you want. It is also not the issue as a secondary issue is child care costs and medical... again 100$ extra per month in gas is *nothing* compared to 800$ a month in ''child care'' and 300$ per visit to the doctor office, 300$ for a procedure less dentist trip..
  • Ajla Is there something proprietary or installed on the moon with these that I'm not aware of?
Next