QOTD: Is the Acura TLX's Facelift Too Little Too Late?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The Acura TLX did not start poorly. When the TL/TSX replacement arrived nearly three years ago, we asked whether the TLX could restore Acura’s car business. First month results were strong.

The next month, the TLX’s early results suggested that, by Acura standards, the core Acura sedan might be a hit.

The Acura TLX then produced some very impressive results in just its third month of availability. In fact, so great were those results, when nearly 5,000 TLXs were sold in October 2014, that Acura has only exceeded that total once in the 28 months since. Instead, TLX sales have rapidly declined, sliding 5 percent in 2015’s fourth-quarter, plunging 21 percent in calendar year 2016, and falling 19 percent so far this year. TLX sales have declined in 14 of the last 16 months, year-over-year.

But 2017’s New York International Auto Show will host the reveal of a refreshed, facelifted Acura TLX next month. Acura says the TLX will feature “a design direction that has already successfully influenced the styling of the 2017 Acura MDX.”

U.S. sales of Acura’s car sales are down 27 percent this year. The Acura brand is down 13 percent. The loss of more than 1,000 TLX sales in just two months is a big factor in the brand’s decline.

Is a refreshed Acura TLX way too little, way too late?

Quick, spacious, and handsomely equipped, the TLX can be had with different engines and transmissions as well as front- or all-wheel drive. Compared with premium rivals, the TLX is affordable, as well. Priced from $32,950, the TLX’s base sticker is thousands of dollars cheaper than the price of top-selling German rivals.

Plus, while as bland as plain rice, the Acura TLX was never incompetent. It handles well, rides very well, and is reasonably efficient. True, the shifter can be annoying and it’s not a particularly aggressive sports sedan. But on paper, this is far from a bad car.

If only the TLX didn’t feel like a very expensive Honda, perhaps we’d have a winner.

And there’s very little Acura can do with a thorough refresh to turn the idea of an Acura TLX into a more prestigious notion.

With crossovers now accounting for seven out of every ten Acura sales, will a refreshed 2018 Acura TLX be enough to get Acura back on the entry luxury map, or is a refresh way too little, way too late?

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 103 comments
  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Mar 30, 2017

    Acura designers should be fired for the ugly pentagon shape front grill! It is the same beek front grill just blacken out and trim in chrome! New look? Right!

  • CaptainJon CaptainJon on Mar 31, 2017

    The TLX is a fine car. The issues it faces are not unique and have been mentioned here. -The market for sedans is in notable decline. -Honda and sedans in general have moved up-market in features. -The notable improvements between the TLX and Accord are not things that excite the general buying public anymore. There are some very special things about that car. The 8-speed dual clutch transmission with torque converter is wonderful. It has taken a few software updates, but it makes wringing out the 2.5 a lot of fun. (Not manual transmission fun, but if you're going to give that engine one transmission, it splits the difference well enough.)The leather quality is a step up. The sound system is a step up. The mentioned transmission is a giant leap up over the CVT in the 4-cyl accord. The PAWS adds another dimension to the car's handling. The car is quieter on the road in my comparison. These are not small differences when combined in a single package. All this comes at an attractive price point, even in comparison to the Accord. The TLX was miss-marketed as a "sports" sedan. What it is, is a completely comfortable and capable highway cruiser and commute companion. Enough so that my wife bought one for her commute. On the highway she's getting within spitting distance of 40mpg with a completely competent drivetrain. She likes the way the dealership treated her at purchase and during servicing. Gripes: Terrible info-tainment, tires that should have been left in the trash, and it could use a little more rear leg room.

  • Todd In Canada Mazda has a 3 year bumper to bumper & 5 year unlimited mileage drivetrain warranty. Mazdas are a DIY dream of high school auto mechanics 101 easy to work on reliable simplicity. IMO the Mazda is way better looking.
  • Tane94 Blue Mini, love Minis because it's total custom ordering and the S has the BMW turbo engine.
  • AZFelix What could possibly go wrong with putting your life in the robotic hands of precision crafted and expertly programmed machinery?
  • Orange260z I'm facing the "tire aging out" issue as well - the Conti ECS on my 911 have 2017 date codes but have lots (likely >70%) tread remaining. The tires have spent quite little time in the sun, as the car has become a garage queen and has likely had ~10K kms put on in the last 5 years. I did notice that they were getting harder last year, as the car pushes more in corners and the back end breaks loose under heavy acceleration. I'll have to do a careful inspection for cracks when I get the car out for the summer in the coming weeks.
  • VoGhost Interesting comments. Back in reality, AV is already here, and the experience to date has been that AV is far safer than most drivers. But I guess your "news" didn't tell you that, for some reason.
Next