Lexus Got What It Hoped for With the New LS - At Least for Now

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Every large, traditional Toyota and Lexus sedan seems to have hit that point in its lifespan where drastic surgery is needed to keep up with the younger crowd. Were these staid sedans people, they’d be milling about in the seating area of a local plastic surgeon’s office.

The first model to bend to Toyota’s desire for large cars that ooze dignified luxury but are also kind of green (and maybe kind of sporty?) was the 2018 Lexus LS flagship, appearing last year with a new platform and racy sheetmetal. The Avalon and ES will soon follow suit.

By revamping its LS, Lexus hoped to jam the brakes on a sales plunge that began after the recession and only got worse from there. Still, the automaker knew it couldn’t turn back the clock completely. There was a very specific sales goal mentioned during the launch, and it looks like the new LS delivered. Almost perfectly, in fact.

As we told you last year, Lexus expected to sell 1,000 LS 500 and LS 500h sedans each month in the United States. Modest figures, for sure, especially for a model that moved 35,226 examples in 2007, but realistic. The brains at Lexus weren’t thinking about 2007 or 2006 or any year before that. They were thinking of the past few years.

In 2017, Lexus sold 4,094 LS cars in the U.S. The tally proved far worse north of the border, where just 40 units drove off Lexus lots. Desperate times, as the saying goes, calls for a top-down redesign.

With a slinky body now in place, motivated by a twin-turbo 3.5-liter V6 making 416 horses (and mated to a 10-speed automatic), the LS now has a persona far removed from its conservative predecessor, which often seemed far more popular on the used market. 2018 models began trickling into dealer lots in February.

So, what did the new sedan do for Lexus’ sales goals? In March, Lexus sold 1,008 LS sedans in the United States. In April? 999. It would appear the brand hit the bullseye.

To put it another way, volume over the first two full months of sales were triple the monthly sales tally from a year before. You’d have to go back to December 2014 to find a month where the LS sold better. In Canada, where the LS had all but disappeared, the model sold 93 copies in the past three months. That’s more than double last year’s tally and just 2 units shy of 2016’s full-year sales.

Is this a temporary bump or the beginning of a sustained reappraisal of the large luxury sedan? Lexus hopes it’s the latter.

[Images: Lexus]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • Pete Zaitcev Pete Zaitcev on May 02, 2018

    I cannot stand the infotainment in the current Lexus. It was much better, even class-leading 10 years ago, when I bought mine. Admittedly, I'm basing my impressions on 2018 NX. Alex Dykes reviewed a new "Entune 3.0", which shows promise, but apparently it's only for mass-market Toyotas.

  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on May 07, 2018

    I was viewing one of Alex Dykes reviews and it got interrupted by a commercial for this bastardization of the LS. The commercial largely revolved around the "TWIN-TURBOS". (Face Palm) This is an LS gentlemen, not a GS/F-sport. Raving about twin turbos to an LS customer is like shooting a commercial for the LaCrosse and going on and on about the fact that there's an available "SPORT MODE".

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next