Idiots Need to Understand That Self-driving Cars Aren't Here Yet

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With automakers, the Department of Transportation, NHTSA, and Congress all attempting to get self-driving vehicles onto the road as quickly as possible, the autonomous revolution finds itself in a sticky situation. Some motorists are confusing their semi-autonomous technology with an impenetrable safety net. This has resulted in avoidable accidents as drivers assume their high-tech cars can cope with whatever’s thrown at them, and it’s probably going to get worse as more idiots buy them.

We’ve already covered how semi-autonomous features make everyone less-effective behind the wheel and the fatal Tesla Autopilot crash was a story we kept up with for over a year. Investigators ruled that accident was the perfect storm of mishaps, however, there remains a common thread between the two pieces. The driver may have been spared were he not so eager to put his faith into the vehicle’s semi-autonomous system.

On Monday, a Tesla Model S collided with stopped firetruck that was responding to an accident on a freeway in Culver City, California. As you already guessed, the driver told the firefighters that the vehicle was operating in Autopilot mode. While nobody was injured in the crash, it’s another stroke in the ugly portrait of people placing blind trust in a technology they don’t understand. And, boy oh boy, are we just getting started on illustrating this problem.

Over the weekend, a drunk driver who passed out while behind the wheel of his Tesla attempted to assure police everything was fine because the vehicle was “on Autopilot.” According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the man was attempting to cross the Bay Bridge and blacked out in traffic. Presumably, Autopilot responded as it was supposed to in this instance and stopped the car when the vehicle realized the driver had stopped interacting with it. But it doesn’t change the fact that morons continue to think semi-autonomous vehicles can do all the work themselves.

In fact, after searching the web for a grand total of 30 seconds, we found a video where a Model X owner calls Autopilot 2 “ basically full autonomous.” The title of the video even calls the car a “Full Self Driving Model X.” The footage is random collection of hand-held shots of his 1,000-mile road trip while he fails to engage with the vehicle in a safe manner. Since the company got lambasted by Consumer Reports last year, Tesla Motors has been pretty clear that drivers aren’t supposed to take their hands off the wheel and now disables Autopilot if a driver fails to do so after the system makes that request.

Great, except the driver in the aforementioned video found away around that. By securing a bottle of water to the steering wheel, he managed to trick the vehicle’s sensors into thinking he’s still holding onto it — allowing for a hands-free experience. There are a lot of videos like this on YouTube. One, in which a man uses an orange to defeat Tesla’s hands-on safety measure, has over 2.5 million views. [Update: this video has since been removed from the internet]

This cornucopia of stupidity is by no means exclusive to Tesla owners. Plenty of automakers have semi-autonomous systems now. Nissan has ProPliot Assist, Cadillac has Super Cruise, BMW has Traffic Jam Assistant, Audi has Traffic Jam Pilot, Mercedes-Benz has Drive Pilot, and Volvo has Pilot Assist. While the systems all function differently, every single one of them can be confused with full autonomy — even though none of them are.

That’s not to insult the various systems. They are all technological marvels (I’m told) and the first time you use them, you’ll walk away impressed. However, the honeymoon phase quickly evolves into complacency. Then the system suddenly fails and and an accident happens.

While it’s easy to blame automakers for marketing these systems as more comprehensive than they actually are, many are very clear about exactly what the technology can do, and all include some kind of safety measure to ensure drivers don’t check out entirely. But that won’t keep a certain percentage of the population from thinking they’ve just purchased a self-driving car.

Honestly, it’s probably better that these types of drivers have advanced safety systems in place to save them from their own stupidity. There’s plenty of research to back up the usefulness of semi-autonomous aids. However, that doesn’t mean automakers shouldn’t go the extra mile to make absolutely certain customers have a complete understanding of the technology, lest they do something foolish to nullify the safety net they paid extra for.

[Image: Culver City Firefighters Local 1927]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 78 comments
  • Doublechili Doublechili on Jan 26, 2018

    Considering some of the drivers out there on the roads, I think I might take my chances with the orange....

  • Tandoor Tandoor on Jan 26, 2018

    When you make something safer, people increase their risk taking back up to the same level they were comfortable with before. You see people drive cars with none of these systems while looking at their phones. Now some cars have systems that allow them to completely ignore the road in relative safety. No surprise they are unprepared for when the system can’t handle the situation.

  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Next