Bang & Blame: GM Making Running Safety Updates to Terrain, Equinox

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The second paragraph of the United States Declaration of Independence states that “all men are created equal,” which is news to me, since I most definitely am not equal to Fernando Alonso in terms of driving skill, for example, although I am pretty adept at lounging in a camping chair.

One item that is most definitely not created equal is the Chevy Equinox/GMC Terrain twins. A running change being implemented on the production lines means some of the GM trucklets are safer than others.

Sleuths over at The Car Connection say The General added more foam blocks and extra welds to the rear side doors of the two crossovers in a bid to boost its performance in a side impact. Initial tests by government crash test dummies found the Equinox/Terrain to be lacking, scoring only three stars for rear passenger crash safety. After a retest requested by GM, the same cars scored five stars.

Right now, the only way to know if a particular Terrain or Equinox includes the extra safety material is to discover when it was built. GMCs assembled after November 27th, 2017 have the new parts, as do Equinox models constructed after February 19th, March 5th, or March 12th. Why so many dates for the ‘nox? It’s all down to the plant at which the machine was manufactured.

Changing up structural components is not exactly like playing Jenga or with Lego blocks, so the Equinox/Terrain team must have been handed an edict from the highest of offices instructing them to add material that would result in a better crash test score. In such a fierce segment, the last remark a new compact crossover wants to have levelled at it is that it scored lower in a crash test than its competitors.

The recently refurbished GMC Terrain sold 85,441 copies in 2017, about equal to the year prior. That’s down from a peak of 112,030 units in 2015. The Equinox, meanwhile, just had its best year ever, with 290,458 leaving dealer showrooms. It hasn’t dropped below 200k units since 2012. Both the Terrain and Equinox enjoyed record years in Canada in 2017.

Both the Terrain and Equinox have a 1.6-liter turbo-diesel on their options list, with that 137 hp/240 lb-ft motor being available in both front- and all-wheel drive. It’s offered on top-spec Chevys but not on high-zoot GMCs. There, it only marches up the trim ladder to next-to-best SLT. A 1.5-liter turbo making 170 hp is the base engine. A 2.0-liter, 252 hp turbocharged inline-four is also on offer and is the one you should get, in case anyone is asking.

[Image: General Motors]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • ClutchCarGo ClutchCarGo on May 24, 2018

    How long until the class action suit representing early Equinox/Terrain buyers?

  • Road_pizza Road_pizza on May 25, 2018

    Am I the only person in America that DOESN'T drive around scared sh*tless that I'll die in a crash???

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next