QOTD: Unnecessary Toughness?

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Late last week we were treated (or suffered, depending on your point of view) with an appearance of a Chevy nameplate not seen on our roads since George W. was just taking office for the second time. The Blazer title holds special significance for this gearhead, as he spent his formative years bouncing around a blue-and-white 1978 model. The psychedelic herringbone seat pattern has been burned into my brain, perhaps explaining many of my incomprehensible behavior patterns.

So I took notice when The General hammered the Blazer name onto a crossover with front-drive roots. Today’s question is different from Friday’s in that we want to know what other refire of a historic name caused your eye to involuntarily twitch?

Yes, it would have been “better” had Chevy tacked a cap onto a four-door Colorado or perhaps even crafted some sort of Wrangler competitor. We all know why they chose not to do that: development costs, return on investment, and a relatively limited customer base. These financially sound reasons were surely beaten to death in infinite-length spreadsheets and PowerPoint presentations. It doesn’t make this Blazer-ite’s heart ache any less seeing the Blazer name on a crossover, no matter how much it looks like a Camaro.

What nameplate from the pages of history do you think was inappropriately applied to an undeserving machine? Dart? Monaco? Nova?

As for the Blazer, I’ll have to be content prying Tahoe badges off all the machines I can find equipped with the five-passenger Midnight Custom package.

[Images: General Motors]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 53 comments
  • Carroll Prescott Carroll Prescott on Jun 25, 2018

    Considering that GM has long abandoned any pretense of having a design department and has decided to go all China on stealing other people's work for its looks (new Shamvette looks like five other automakers' work smashed together), I'd say the Blazer is no different - looks like a Korean ready for a street corner. This is so blatantly a ripoff. But it will sell. As for sullying a name in Chevrolet past, I don't care. None are worth spit to me unless they are attached to something built in the 1960s - and then I'd buy one.

  • Jeffrey Sproul Jeffrey Sproul on Jun 25, 2018

    This perfect name would have been the Chevy Sombrero hecho in Mexico.

  • MaintenanceCosts Other sources seem to think that the "electric Highlander" will be built on TNGA and that the other 3-row will be on an all-new EV-specific platform. In that case, why bother building the first one at all?
  • THX1136 Two thoughts as I read through the article. 1) I really like the fins on this compared to the others. For me this is a jet while the others were propeller driven craft in appearance.2) The mention of the wider whitewalls brought to mind a vague memory. After the wider version fell out of favor I seem to remember that one could buy add-on wide whitewalls only that fit on top of the tire so the older look could be maintained. I remember they would look relatively okay until the add-on would start to ripple and bow out indicating their exact nature. Thanks for the write up, Corey. Looking forward to what's next.
  • Analoggrotto It's bad enough we have to read your endless Hyundai Kia Genesis shilling, we don't want to hear actually it too. We spend good money on speakers, headphones and amplifiers!
  • Redapple2 Worthy of a book
  • Pig_Iron This message is for Matthew Guy. I just want to say thank you for the photo article titled Tailgate Party: Ford Talks Truck Innovations. It was really interesting. I did not see on the home page and almost would have missed it. I think it should be posted like Corey's Cadillac series. 🙂
Next