Pony Car Check-up: If Only Our Lives Were As Stable As the Dodge Challenger's Sales

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

What’s something that’s really, really old, yet continues to attract a steady flow of buyers year after year? You could say the Colt 1911 and its knock-offs, and you’d be right — in fact, an old American pistol that packs a punch and never really saw the need to improve in a major way seems like an apt comparison to what we’re actually talking about.

When it first appeared on sales charts in May of 2008, the Dodge Challenger was pure throwback. A cherry to place on top of the brash, retro sundae Chrysler had constructed out of its 300 and Charger sedans. In case you missed it, last month was the 10-year anniversary of the reborn Challenger’s first full month of American sales; the TTAC crew deferred its celebrations until July 4th.

Taking a look at the sales performance of its domestic, um, challengers, it seems like the two-door Dodge might outlive us all. Will the last American passenger car on the market ride into the sunset with a supercharged roar and two smoking rear tires?

You’d be forgiven for thinking that. In terms of volume, the Challenger takes second place in the pony car battle with 37,367 units sold over the first half of 2018. But while the first-place Ford Mustang’s 42,428 YTD sales modestly trounces its FCA rival, trajectory counts for something.

Mustang volume fell 4.9 percent, year to date, despite June providing the Blue Oval with a 19.6 percent year-over-year uptick for the month. The Challenger, on the other hand, saw sales rise 3.3 percent, year over year. Over 2018’s first half, Challenger volume rose 4.1 percent.

It’s worth noting that Mustang sales are far more fickle than that of the Challenger’s. To look at the last 15 years in Mustang sales is to look at twin peaks. From 166,530 units sold in 2006 to just 66,623 three years later, Mustang sales rebounded to 122,349 in 2015, only to fall again, to less than 82,000 in 2017.

The Mustang’s a yo-yo. That’s what you get when you actually redesign your model once in a while.

Anyway, if Fiat Chrysler keeps this up, it just might find itself surpassing last year’s tally, which wasn’t far off 2015’s high water mark. That year, after seven years of steadily rising volume, Americans took home 66,365 of the LX-platform coupes. The following year saw 64,478 Challengers leave the dealer lot. And 2017? FCA unloaded 64,537 of ’em. That’s amazingly consistent volume for a heavy, two-door passenger car that isn’t exactly the freshest thing around.

Of course, it’s one only a few vehicles where you’ll need all five fingers on one hand to count the engine options, with no electric assistance in sight. Only the addition, years back, of a 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 base engine and eight-speed automatic in the lineup gave any nod towards environmental stewardship. And yet the Challenger, a decade on, manages to buck two trends: our simultaneous, self-defeating thirst for both SUVs and ultra-green driving (the latter of which is mainly just an OEM rivalry spurred by rosy predictions and fear of government).

For the coming model year, the Challenger Hellcat gains an additional 10 ponies (to 717 hp), while the semi-Demon Reyere variant leaves the gate with 797 hp on tap. It’s amazing seeing the amount of mileage FCA gets out of adding power to an ancient model.

But you’re forgetting something, you say. What about the Chevrolet Camaro?

Can’t forget that, though many buyers already have. The Camaro’s first-half volume stands at 25,380 vehicles, which represents a 30.6 percent drop from the same period last year. We can only average GM’s quarterly sales reports over three months, but it returns a figure of 4,529 — meaning June likely saw a year-over-year sales dip. Sadly for Chevy, the sixth-generation lookalike Camaro, even with the addition of the 650 hp ZL1, hasn’t set sales on fire.

Its introduction led to a steady decline for the model which, to its credit, still posted sales volume of over 67,000 vehicles in 2017.

For 2019, the model u ndergoes a trim-dependent styling refresh (Turbo 1LE seen above) and makes four-cylinder power available on more variants, possibly luring in buyers interested in extra features and flash, but no additional dash. To beat the Challenger in full-year 2018 sales, those new faces will need to prove very popular.

[Images: © 2018 Tim Healey/TACC, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 71 comments
  • Sikeh Beryuf Sikeh Beryuf on Nov 09, 2018

    The Roar of the Dodge Challenger’s Engine contributes greatly to its stable sales. I know the sound of the engine may sound unimportant, however, this sound tells prospective buyers a different story. When the hear the sound, it feels like the Dodge is most powerful car on the street and there is nothing better than the Dodge. And when they finally set eyes on the ride, they design is impressive and imposing, giving them one choice.

    • Nrd515 Nrd515 on Dec 07, 2018

      I've had a Challenger since 2010, and almost every day, I get comments, all positive about it. Old guys want one, middle aged guys and quite a few women want one. My friend's grandkids want one, but they will surely be gone when they are able to drive in 7-9 years. And the sound of the 6.4 is fantastic.

  • Ceipower Ceipower on Jan 19, 2019

    The Camaro went from bland front end styling , to a confused and frankly ugly look. Like it or not , the Challenger even with it’s tiny year to year updates , still. Looks good , has more interior room and far better outward visibility. As for the Mustang , hey. , it seems to be in far better control of its heritage than Camaro.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next