Feds to Big Auto: Spill It

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The U.S. Commerce Department wants automakers to whisper in its ear. And by whisper, we mean fill out a 34-page questionnaire detailing all their secrets — the nitty gritty of product planning, suppliers, and finances not already disclosed in public filings — under threat of financial penalty or imprisonment.

As one would assume, this latest chapter in the Commerce Department’s investigation into the possibility that imported autos pose a national security threat to the U.S. isn’t going over well.

“The breadth and depth of this request is invasive, requiring massive amounts of proprietary and confidential business data from global operations — all under the pretense of national security,” Gloria Bergquist, spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, told Bloomberg. The Alliance represents several unnamed automakers who received the questionnaire.

“Frankly, it’s stunning from an administration committed to getting government out of the way of business,” Bergquist said.

The Trump administration kicked off the investigation to determine whether tariffs are needed on imported vehicles and parts. Automakers protested the threatened 25-percent tariff, claiming U.S. consumers would face steep price hikes in the wake of any new import levy. Even vehicles built in the U.S., like the Toyota Camry, stand to see a not-inconsequential MSRP boost.

Many see the threats as Trump’s way of forcing the European Union to back off its own 10 percent import tariffs on foreign autos.

To automakers that received the questionnaire, however, the more immediate issue is the discomfort that comes from spilling your secrets. From Bloomberg:

The Trump administration wants such things as how much each company’s research budget goes to specific areas such as autonomous driving, electric drive, connected vehicles, and lightweight technology. The questionnaire also seeks a list of suppliers for major vehicles systems and where they’re located.

The Trump administration also wants details about company business plans from now until 2020. One section of the questionnaire asked for plans for every global plant, requiring the companies to reveal whether the plants will be expanded, contracted, modernized, or closed. The administration also asked the companies for explanations about why they manufacture in foreign trade zones.

The survey also asks if imports hurt sales, profits or margins. And it directly asks, “How has import competition affected your U.S. manufacturing operations, sales, employment, planned expansions, investments, etc. with respect to the production of passenger cars, light trucks, SUVs and vans from 2013 to Q2 2018.”

Former Commerce Department chief economist Susan Helper said that, in the past, such questionnaires usually targeted the defence industry.

“I can see both sides on this — it is burdensome for companies, but on the other hand it’s important for policy makers to understand global supply chains as they have an increasing impact on the U.S. economy,” she said.

A hearing scheduled for this coming Thursday in Washington will see 45 industry representatives testify in front of the Commerce Department. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has until February to conclude the investigation and issue a recommendation to Trump.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 66 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Jul 15, 2018

    Hey, be nice to each other in the comment section, keep it at least relevant and no dog whistle blowing. Now excuse me while I blow this dog whistle, sit back, and watch the comment section blow up. I almost miss Bertel at this point. Almost.

    • See 1 previous
    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jul 16, 2018

      @Maxb49 Well I believe Farago has sold off a couple of websites and now owns the sort of cars the rest of us schmucks argue about on here. And I wouldn't try to steal one given the subject matter of his last venture...He owns a lot of those as well.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jul 16, 2018

    Big Al--Ideally a Free Trade Agreement but if the US cannot reach one then at least have reciprocal tariffs. The US in the past has not negotiated Free Trade Agreements and has gotten the short end of the stick. I agree with Trump that these trade deals should be renegotiated but I don't agree with his approach. It would be better to have no tariffs across the board but that most likely will never happen. Each country wants to protect their market. In the case of China it is more than just free trade, it is the theft of technology. Denver Mike brings up a valid point about the technical barriers especially the EU countries have on vehicles.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next