Mike Manley Hits the Ground Running As Storm Clouds Gather Over FCA

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Former Jeep and Ram boss Mike Manley was a top choice among the candidates competing to succeed Sergio Marchionne, but no one could have expected his ascension to the CEO’s chair would occur in such a sudden, tragic manner.

During his first earning call, Manley was forced to address not just his predecessor’s death — which occurred mere hours before investors, analysts, and journalists picked up the phone — but also the automaker’s slipping grasp on the Chinese market. FCA’s revenue and net income took a haircut in the second quarter of 2018. The company’s share price plunged in the wake of news of Marchionne’s death. And, last but not least, there’s tariffs flying left and right, cutting into the automaker’s earnings — indeed, the company has already readjusted its earnings forecast downward.

Some first week on the job.

Marchionne’s passing took top billing during the earnings call. According to Automotive News, an emotional Manley said he spent “the last nine years of my life” interacting with Marchionne on a daily basis. The former CEO’s death was “heartbreaking,” he said. “There’s no doubt that he was a unique man, and he will be sorely missed.”

After a moment of silence, Manley dived into the pressing issues. While second-quarter revenue rose 4 percent to $33.91 billion, net income fell 35 percent to $881.9 million. Marchionne had warned him that Q2 numbers wouldn’t be great, Manley said.

Headwinds in China are growing, with the automaker reporting a Q2 loss of $115 million in the Asia market. China, the world’s largest car market, has a big bullseye on it for FCA’s Jeep brand. In light of this information, FCA altered its expected 2018 revenue from $146.2 billion to somewhere between $134.5 billion and $138.9 billion.

That said, there was a tidbit of good news. The $1.53 billion in net industrial debt FCA recorded at the end of Q1 is now $533 million in net cash.

Seeking to reassure investors, Manley said the five-year plan unveiled by Marchionne in June is still a go. “Fundamentally, my mandate is to deliver that five year plan,” he said. “My intention is to deliver that plan as a strong, independent FCA, and my team is focused on that as well.”

In the U.S., sales of FCA vehicles are up 5 percent over the first half of 2018, but Ram sales are down 7 percent. Blame the slow rollout of 2019 Ram 1500 models, and especially the missing-in-action mild-hybrid V6 and V8 engines slated to bolster the standard 5.7-liter Hemi. The old model (“Classic”) continues in production, helping overall Ram volume.

Manley claims production of the “DT” (next-gen) pickup has reached 85 percent, with full production expected in the fourth quarter. The 48-volt eTorque engines will be available by that time. Another $300 million was spent in Q2 to smooth the production hurdles, he added.

In China, the addition of the three-row Jeep Grand Commander and a new marketing campaign will help sales somewhat, Manley said, though he admitted these factors aren’t likely to solve all of the brand’s problems.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • Carroll Prescott Carroll Prescott on Jul 25, 2018

    Why should FCA worry about China? There must already be a dozen ripoffs of Jeeps on the market that the stupid chinese consumer will buy.

  • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Jul 26, 2018

    For all the praise given in the Sergio requiem awhile back, I didn't like the FCM business plan during his reign. It was the American taxpayer that saved Chrysler, not Sergio. In fact, I think he got away with robbery when purchasing. Nothing motor wise was really accomplished. The ram is still their big engine. What real changes have been made to this motor in all these decades? The cars are still the same crap they took over from Merc many years ago. The 200 was a mess. And has anybody seen or driven the new e-systems promised on their truck and hopefully jeeps??? I have seen on display at the shows but never seen one reviewed. Even the Jeeps are really largely the same as a decade ago. Most companies would never have their main powerhouses stay so old. The only vehicle I would consider and do is the Pacifica. That was a well-done improvement. Not sure if the new team even has any R&D money to make the changes.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next