BMW: Keep Lining Up for a Stick, and We'll Keep Making One

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The list of new vehicles available with a manual transmission grows shorter each year, and for the vast majority of the driving populace, that’s just fine. But driving enthusiasts bemoan each model lost to the advancing wave of computer-controlled everything, closely keeping tabs on which vehicles can still be had with a three-pedal setup. A few might even buy one.

Even sporting European brands are not immune. In BMW’s stable, the 5 Series jettisoned its last 5 and 6 Series sticks (by then relegated to M models) in 2016. Other models went two pedal-only in recent years, including the 228i, 328i, and 428i. But BMW says there’s still a flame that keeps the transmission option alive in certain models, and it’ll keep building them until buyers give up, or our robot overlords take over.

Specifically, BMW means the M variants of the 2, 3, and 4 Series.

Speaking to Car and Driver, BMW M boss Frank van Meel said the manual transmission will not die with the current generation of Bimmer products. However, with autonomy looming on the horizon, he envisions a date when the manual transmission no longer has any practical use (because there won’t be a human driver behind the wheel).

“The bad news is that if we one day have autonomous cars, then the manual cannot work anymore,” van Meel said, “so that would be, let’s say, the natural end. But that’s still some time away.”

Live it up while you still can, seems to be the message here.

In terms of product, one particular model sees a surprising number of buyers opt for a stick shift, ensuring the manual’s availability for at least the near future.

“The BMW M2 Competition still has the manual for a reason, because in the U.S. we have more than a 50 percent take rate on manual transmissions for the M2,” the M chief said. “Buyers vote with their wallets for manual transmissions. Now, being an engineer, I would say from a rational standpoint that even though the manual gearbox is lighter than an automated gearbox, it uses more fuel and is slower, so it doesn’t really make sense . . . But from the emotional standpoint, a lot of customers say, ‘I don’t care, I want to have one.’”

van Meel added, “As long as we have these take rates on M2, and also the M3 and M4, we’re going to offer manuals, because we listen to our customers. Even though as an engineer I’d say we don’t necessarily need one. If demand is so high, then why not fulfill it?”

[Images: BMW]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • Funky D Funky D on Jul 31, 2018

    I have been driving manuals since they were primarily 4 speeds (then 5, then 6, ...) and have loved them all. My current ride was equipped with a DCT, and while it is a much different experience than the 3-pedal one, it is pretty much the same amount of fun. As long as I have that mechanical connection with the drivetrain, I still have that oneness with the car that I have long enjoyed with the manual. My next car will be a 3-pedal manual if I can get it, but if it DCTs from now on, I can live with that.

  • Stuki Stuki on Aug 01, 2018

    "It works, I had a loaded 2015 Mustang GT with radar cruise and it wasn’t a problem. If need be the system simply cut off if I didn’t down shift based on whatever reasoning was programmed into the system." Man, so even the 'Stang has this, now! Sweet! The world's a slightly less depressing place than I assumed it was, then!!

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next