Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
A boy using Twitter on a mobile phone
A boy using Twitter on a mobile phone. Twitter has suspended users with a date of birth that may mean they were under 13 when they signed up. Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo
A boy using Twitter on a mobile phone. Twitter has suspended users with a date of birth that may mean they were under 13 when they signed up. Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo

Twitter blocking users who were underage when they signed up

This article is more than 5 years old

Tech firm acts on accounts created by users under 13 at the time to comply with GDPR

In an effort to comply with GDPR, Twitter is blocking users who were underage when they signed up for the service – even if they’re now well over 18.

The company instituted a wave of account suspensions on 25 May, the day the new privacy regulation came into effect, locking the accounts of any user whose self-declared date of birth suggested that they may have been under 13 at the point they signed up for the account.

“I received a message saying my account was now locked, and would require parental consent in order to process my data, or my account will be deleted,” one user, who is 20, told the Guardian. He had signed up for an account in 2009 without entering a birthday, and then put a fake age in once the company introduced the ability to add that information, before recently updating it to his actual birthday.

Q&A

What is GDPR?

Show

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into force on 25 May 2018, replaced the patchwork of national data protection laws across the EU with a unified system that greatly increased the fines regulators could issue, strengthened the requirements for consent to data processing, and created a new pan-European data regulator called the European Data Protection Board.

The regulation governs the processing and storage of EU citizens' data whether or not the company has operations in the EU. To ensure companies comply, GDPR also gives data regulators the power to fine up to €20m, or 4% of annual global turnover. In the UK, the previous maximum fine was £500,000; the post-GDPR record currently stands at more than £180m, for a data breach reported by British Airways in 2018. 

Data breaches must be reported within 72 hours to a data regulator, and affected individuals must be notified unless the data stolen is unreadable. Fines can also be levied against companies that act on data without explicit and informed user consent, or who fail to ensure that consent can be withdrawn at any time.

GDPR also refined and enshrined in law the concept of the "right to be forgotten", renaming it as the "right to erasure", and gave EU citizens the right to data portability, allowing them to take data from one organisation and give it to another.

Was this helpful?

Twitter declined to comment, but a source at the company confirmed that it now has a policy to retroactively lock accounts created by children. Since it does not have the tools to separate the content a user created while under 13 from content created when over 13, the Twitter source explained, it instead decided that the only way to comply with GDPR was to suspend users who have a date of birth that may mean they were under 13 when they signed up.

All is not lost for those users: Twitter is apparently working on a more permanent solution, and some former children online have reported being able to restore access to their accounts by repeatedly submitting documentation proving their current age.

The issue stems from stronger requirements under GDPR around data protection for children. GDPR mandates new ages of consent in the EU, and reinforces the previous minimum of 13. That means that some users, depending on location, will be able to restore access with parental consent, even if they are now adults in their own right, while others will not regain access to their account at all.

Twitter appears to be the only social network that has interpreted GDPR in this way. Snapchat, Facebook and Instagram were all unable to provide an immediate response to queries about their own application of the regulation, but none of the companies has enforced similar bans on users who are currently overage.

Explore more on these topics

Most viewed

Most viewed