The Lexus CT200h Is Dead, Though It Was Way More Popular Than the HS250h You Forgot Existed

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The current 2017 model year will be the last for the Lexus CT200h.

An indirect successor to the Lexus HS250h sedan, the Lexus CT200h will end a seven-year model run in the United States that resulted in more than 90,000 sales.

Imported from Miyawaka, Japan, the Lexus CT has seen its average U.S. monthly output fall 58 percent over the last three years. Never a tremendously popular entry-level luxury car, the hybrid-only Lexus was forced to compete against very successful luxury sedans from Mercedes-Benz and Audi — CLA and A3, respectively — in the latter portion of its tenure.

The Lexus couldn’t compete.

It couldn’t compete with luxury rivals.

It couldn’t compete with high-efficiency hybrids.

It couldn’t compete as an older passenger car design in a market that’s increasingly fond of new crossover designs.

U.S. sales of the Lexus CT200h peaked at the end of its first year. In December 2011, 2,259 copies of the CT200h found U.S. owners. Only on four other occasions did the CT ever manage more than 2,000 monthly sales. Over the last 18 months, Lexus averaged fewer than 800 monthly CT200h sales.

With admittedly much broader lineups, including all-wheel-drive variants, Audi averages nearly 2,500 A3 sales per month in the United States while Mercedes-Benz’s CLA-Class now averages just under 2,000 sales per month. The CT200h is priced from $32,245. The A3’s base MSRP is slightly lower; the CLA’s slightly higher.

Advances in Toyota’s own hybrids also mean the CT200h doesn’t appear as efficient now as it did when it debuted in 2011. Upon its introduction, the CT200h’s 43/40 mpg city/highway ratings compared somewhat favorably with the Toyota Prius’s 49/46 EPA figures.

But the CT200h is still a 43/40 car in an era of 58/53-mpg Prii. While not a direct Prius rival, the Prius’s advances mean the Lexus no longer has the numbers to stand out, particularly since consumers generally consider fuel to be sufficiently inexpensive.

Furthermore, tastes have changed. The CT200h is by no means the only Lexus struggling. Through the first one-third of 2017, passenger car sales at Lexus (excluding the now discontinued CT200h) are down 33 percent, a loss of nearly 13,000 sales, year-over-year, over the span of just four months.

66 percent of Lexus’ U.S. volume is now generated by SUVs/crossovers. Cars produced slightly more than half of all Lexus sales the year the CT200h debuted. As a result, the Lexus CT200h will, in a sense, eventually be replaced by a utility vehicle below the NX, Car And Driver reports.

Thus, a hybrid hatchback dies.

Shocking.

[Image:Lexus]

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net and a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • 05lgt 05lgt on May 31, 2017

    What does this car offer that isn't better in a Volt? (known Lexus fanboi and confirmed GM hater here.)

  • Home Advisors Home Advisors on Oct 17, 2017

    I owned the CT200h for a year. I really love the car and the design. However, this car was not made for the Northeast winter; the car was simply horrible in the snow.

  • Shipwright As my Avatar shows I had an '08 GT 500, Grabber Orange convertible. I now own a '12 GT 500 Kona Blue coupe.
  • ArialATOMV8 I tend to prefer more amusing colors when picking out a car (if possible). My 2017 Lexus RX is painted in a Nightfall Mica (Dark Blue) and I really dig the look. In the dealership it stands out compared to the regular tame blacks, silvers and whites. Soon I may be at the point to afford a new car and when I do, I'll do my part and spec/hunt for an allocation of a vibrant color.
  • Tassos Tim is not that good with colors.The bright "pink" is not pink, but FUCHSIA. Both colors may look good on a woman's sweater, but not on steel panels.
  • Tassos While I was a very satisfied owner of a much earlier Accord COupe 5 speed (a 1990 I owned from 1994 to 2016), I don't like the exterior styling of this one so much, in fact the 2017 sedan looks better. Or maybe it sucks in white. The interior of my 1990 was very high quality, this one looks so-so. The 157 k miles were probably easy highway miles. Still, Hondas are not Toyotas, and I remember the same service (like timing belt replacement) back then cost TWICE for an Accord than for a Camry. Add to this that it has the accursed CVT, and it's a no. Not that I am in the market for a cheap econobox anyway.
  • 3-On-The-Tree My 2009 C6 corvette in black looks great when it’s all washed and waxed but after driving down my 1.3 mile long dirt road it’s a dust magnet. I like white because dust doesn’t how up easily. Both my current 2021 Tundra and previous 2014 Ford F-150 3.5L Ecobomb are white
Next