Congress Will Be Bombarded With Autonomous Car Propaganda This Week
This week, the Coalition for Future Mobility — a recently formed automotive trade group representing major automakers and self-driving advocates — will roll out a bevy of targeted television spots, print ads, and social media posts specifically designed to encourage Congress to adopt legislation assisting the budding industry’s growth.
Earlier in the month, the House of Representatives passed a bill that would expedite the deployment of self-driving cars and prohibit states from blocking autonomous vehicle testing. This was immediately followed by Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao publicly outlining the NHTSA’s updated automotive safety guidance — which was less about ensuring the safe development of self-driving cars and more about destroying regulatory red tape.
The Senate is the final piece of the puzzle. Automakers want to make sure it’s seeing things their way before casting their vote on whether or not the industry gets the governmental green light.
The House proposal only applies to vehicles under 10,000 pounds and would permit automakers to obtain exemptions to deploy up to 25,000 test vehicles without meeting existing auto safety standards in the first year. The cap would rise over a three-year period to 100,000 vehicles annually and could not be blocked by individual states. However, the Senate is looking at its own legislation that would likely expand to include heavier commercial vehicles.
Coalition for Future Mobility radio spots have been running for several weeks already. But this week’s sudden influx of persuasive media is to help influence Congress. According to Reuters, a Senate panel could take up the autonomous issue by October 4th — making this an opportune time to begin the campaign.
Here’s a taste of what the Coalition for Future Mobility has in store for them:
In addition to the advertisements, automakers will reach out to employees and retirees to encourage their members of Congress to support autonomous deployment, a spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers explained. The coalition isn’t soft-balling its message, either. It’s framing this entire situation as a important cultural milestone and historical turning point on its website:
“Sixty years ago, at a moment in time when visionary action was needed, Congress passed the federal interstate highway act. It brought mobility to a nation, strengthening the economy in a powerful way. This Congress is poised to make history again….to make its own tremendous advancements in transportation by liberating innovation for self-driving vehicles.
Right now, Congress is laying out a road map for self-driving vehicles in order to bring a host of benefits to Americans.”
The entire issue, as well as the campaign, is somewhat divisive. On one hand, automakers, tech companies, and advocates of autonomous vehicles would absolutely benefit from being mired in regulatory oversight. It could be the leg-up domestic firms need to ensure dominance in the new industry and get products to market. But safety advocates are right in throwing some shade at the government and automotive lobbyists. While automakers aren’t going to intentionally endanger the public, operating without a net could pose unnecessary risks.
Of course, safety advocates also say that self-driving technologies could eventually save 35,000 lives annually and reduce traffic accidents by a whopping 94 percent.
[Image: Coalition for Future Mobility]
A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Theflyersfan I always thought this gen XC90 could be compared to Mercedes' first-gen M-class. Everyone in every suburban family in every moderate-upper-class neighborhood got one and they were both a dumpster fire of quality. It's looking like Volvo finally worked out the quality issues, but that was a bad launch. And now I shall sound like every car site commenter over the last 25 years and say that Volvo all but killed their excellent line of wagons and replaced them with unreliable, overweight wagons on stilts just so some "I'll be famous on TikTok someday" mom won't be seen in a wagon or minivan dropping the rug rats off at school.
- Theflyersfan For the stop-and-go slog when sitting on something like The 405 or The Capital Beltway, sure. It's slow and there's time to react if something goes wrong. 85 mph in Texas with lane restriping and construction coming up? Not a chance. Radar cruise control is already glitchy enough with uneven distances, lane keeping assist is so hyperactive that it's turned off, and auto-braking's sole purpose is to launch loose objects in the car forward. Put them together and what could go wrong???
- Jalop1991 This is easy. The CX-5 is gawdawful uncomfortable.
- Aaron This is literally my junkyard for my 2001 Chevy Tracker, 1998 Volvo S70, and 2002 Toyota Camry. Glad you could visit!
- Lou_BC Let me see. Humans are fallible. They can be very greedy. Politicians sell to the highest bidder. What could go wrong?
Comments
Join the conversation
Such shallow advocacy...."liberating innovation"? What form of enlightenment will creating indiscriminate chaos in high-noon Sunday traffic provide? I don't know the details of the legislation but we need to have some basic protections against the danger posed by bad autonomous vehicles. Clearly this group has some special interest in ensuring that manufacturers are given free reign... I don't see the benefit of turning this emerging market into the wild west...Bad autonomous technology in the wild can only destroy these companies and their reputations...this deserves an "abundance of caution" not "visionary action".
Advertisement uses guy in wheelchair to advocate for relaxing safety standards. Got it. But seriously, I think the phrase "collateral damage" is going to come back in vogue.