Let's Try This Again: Fiat Chrysler Attempts to Certify 2017 Diesel Rams and Jeeps, Avoid Fines

by Steph Willems

Published: May 19th, 2017

let s try this again fiat chrysler attempts to certify 2017 diesel rams and jeeps

After being forbidden from selling 2017 Ram 1500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee models equipped with the 3.0-liter diesel V6, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles is hoping for a little love from the Environmental Protection Agency.

The EPA suspended the certification process in January after discovering eight undeclared auxiliary emissions control devices on the EcoDiesel models. The existence of the software, installed in those vehicles since the 2014 model year, earned FCA a notice of violation of the Clean Air Act. Since then, the automaker has attempted to work with environmental regulators to smooth over the controversy, even as its mailbox filled with subpoenas from federal and state authorities.

Yesterday, we learned the Justice Department was readying a lawsuit against FCA. With the potential for billions of dollars in fines staring it in the face, FCA has whipped up a new application in the hopes of placating the EPA and selling some light-duty diesels.

This morning, the automaker announced it had filed an application for diesel vehicle emissions certification with the EPA and California Air Resources Board for the Ram and Jeep models. This time around, the models come equipped with “updated emissions software calibrations.”

In a release, FCA stated:

The filing is the result of many months of close collaboration between FCA US and EPA and CARB, including extensive testing of the vehicles, to clarify issues related to the Company’s emissions control technology. With the permission of EPA and CARB, FCA US intends to install the same modified emissions software in 2014-2016 MY Jeep Grand Cherokee and Ram 1500 diesel vehicles. FCA US believes this will address the agencies’ concerns regarding the emissions software calibrations in those vehicles.

FCA US also believes that these actions should help facilitate a prompt resolution to ongoing discussions with the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and other governmental agencies.

As part of its attempt to appease regulators, FCA claims it will make the software updates available to owners of 2014-2016 Ram and Jeep Grand Cherokee EcoDiesel owners through their dealership. The automaker says it doesn’t expect “any impact on performance or fuel efficiency.”

FCA denied it was attempting to pull a fast one on the EPA, with CEO Sergio Marchionne saying at the time, “We’re not trying to break the bloody law.” The maximum fine FCA could face for each of the 104,000 affected vehicles stands at $44,539 — a $4.6 billion price tag.

There has so far been no response from the EPA, meaning it could be a tense weekend in Auburn Hills.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#Diesel #EcoDiesel #Emissions #EPA #Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #Jeep #LawAndOrder #Ram

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 15 comments

Klossfam on May 19, 2017

I had my 2015 RAM 1500 EcoD for 18 months and had 3 software reflashes just in that period of time...So EcoDiesel owners will not be intimidated by additional software updates...It was 32,000 trouble free miles for the most part...the updates were mainly to fix things like overly sensitive EGR valve warnings and similar false check engine warnings. I have a 2017 Ridgeline now but it sucks that the EPA had/has to torture FCA about this power plant...

Like Reply
No Nickname Required on May 19, 2017

Those FCA engineers must have been working around the clock for the past 24 hours to complete that "extensive testing". Seriously though, I fail to see why FCA has been dragging their feet about this whole issue. It seems to me that if they are telling the truth they have nothing to hide. Just disclose what the software is and what it does and let the EPA see for themselves.

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Mopar4wd on May 19, 2017
  
  From what I understand they have released to EPA the issue seems to be they did not file the proper paperwork disclosing the programing earlier. I have not heard if the EPA would have allowed it had they filed the paperwork, which seems to be FCAs contention. It seems what the software does is in a grey area where the EPA may have allowed it had it been disclosed.
  
  Like
- Flipper35 on May 22, 2017
  
  @mopar4wd That was my understanding as well. The undisclosed controls are what got them into trouble. The EPA thinks they may or may not be a defeat device but don't know since the paperwork was not filed for the controls.
  
  Like
- No Nickname Required on May 22, 2017
  
  Thanks for the clarification guys. It makes more sense now.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

1995 SC The sad thing is GM tends to kill cars when they get them right, so this was probably a pretty good car
Mason Had this identical car as a 17 year old in the late 90's. What a ball of fun, one of many I wish I still had.
FinnEss At my age, sedans are difficult to get into without much neck and hip adjustment.I apologize sincerely but that is just the way it is. A truck is my ride of choice.Pronto
Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
Duties The U.S . would have enough energy to satisfy our needs and export energy if JoeBama hadn’t singlehandedly shut down U.S. energy exploration and production. Furthermore, at current rates of consumption, the U.S. has over two centuries of crude oil, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/exclusive-current-rates-consumption-us-has-more-two-centuries-oil-report.Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.