Vellum Venom Vignette: Flattened Fenders and Air Curtains

by Sajeev Mehta

Published: May 26th, 2017

vellum venom vignette flattened fenders and air curtains

Mike writes:

Sajeev,

I have noticed something on newer cars, and it’s been bothering me for awhile now. Perhaps you, with your deity-like omniscience (and access to inside information) will be able to provide some clarity.

As you can see from the picture below, a new Toyota has this vertical flat area around the wheels. And it’s not just this particular model of car — nearly every modern car I see on the road today has a similar design feature, though they vary in the width of the flat area around the wheel arch. Contrast this the Clinton-era Toyo at the bottom, where the body lines follow a graceful curve all the way to the fender opening.

To my eye, the wheel arch flatness looks terrible. Are every automaker’s designers on the same drugs, or is this done for an actual reason — i.e, aerodynamics, or possibly to make the wheels appear larger (another trend which befuddles me)?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you!

Sajeev answers:

Access to inside information in the car design biz? Deity-like omniscience? Hardly. I contacted two experts in aerodynamics and neither responded. Even worse, one is a longtime family friend.

Aesthetically speaking: I agree. The flattened fender arches add an unnecessarily complex or flow-killing stylistic element to a vehicle’s bodyside.

Realistically speaking: The hard transition provides an aero benefit I cannot independently verify. I reckon it reduces drag and/or turbulence around the wheels, especially when adding air curtains. The two might combine to “clean up” (technical term) airflow around the front wheels. Which implies your ride gets quieter and more fuel efficient — not just for fancy BMWs, but also for the Ford F-150 and Mustang.

Which begs the question, how much does this really help? Bullet-nosed faces of the 1990s are history and we still have pedestrian-friendly fronts with extensive amounts of frontal area. Perhaps that’s why air curtains are necessary: every little bit helps.

If you’re a Car Design Wonk, please chime in below or drop me an email.

[Image: BMW, the OP, Ford]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

#AeroCurtain #AeroCurtains #Aerodynamic #AerodynamicDrag #Aerodynamics #AirCurtain #AirCurtains #CarDesign #CarStyling #Drag #Fender #WheelArch #FlatFender #WheelWell

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 39 comments

V-Strom rider on May 28, 2017

My M235i has them - my least favourite part of an otherwise beautiful car.

Like Reply
Lightspeed on May 30, 2017

Truly hate those flat arches, one reason I love my 2000 Lexus GS, it has box-flares! real, live box-flares! Todays cars are nearly indistinguishable from one another and the interiors even more so. The designers today strike me as being more interested in anime and comic books than in cars, hence cars and trucks becoming so cartoonish. I drove a Lexus NX loaner a few weeks ago and was embarrassed to seen in the thing, and not even because of the grille, but because of the giant flat wheel arches.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.