Tiny Swedes: Volvo Won't Ignore the Subcompact Segment, Hints U.S. Chief

by Steph Willems

Published: April 19th, 2017

tiny swedes volvo won t ignore the subcompact segment hints u s chief

With the stately S90 sedan and V90 wagon out of the way, Volvo’s main focus falls on the upcoming S40 and XC40 compact sedan and crossover. In the middle ground, the Swedish automaker has already unveiled the handsomely redesigned 2018 XC60.

Will it stop there? Not according to Volvo Car USA’s president and CEO.

Speaking to Car & Driver about the brand’s naming process, Lex Kerssemakers mentioned the Volvo range won’t use the 40-series as a basement.

“It’s pretty straightforward: The 90 is the biggest, and the 40 is the smallest,” Kerssemakers said. “And when there is a 20, it will be a smaller one.”

This is the first time anyone has mentioned a potential upcoming subcompact from the automaker. As Volvo only builds vehicles for global markets, it’s a near-certainty the U.S. would see at least one vehicle from the 20-series range. If the range includes a hatchback and a small crossover, it’s the latter that could prove the most competitive.

Buyers have taken a shine to very small utility vehicles, and the segment represents an untapped area of growth for the resurgent Volvo. In the premium field, Mercedes-Benz already fields its GLA, while BMW has the X1. Downmarket options include the Mazda CX-3, Honda HR-V and new Toyota C-HR, along with the Jeep Renegade and Chevrolet Trax/Buick Encore.

There’s probably room for Volvo at the table.

“Growth has tapered off sharply in early 2017, which is to be expected,” said TTAC sales analyst Tim Cain of the subcompact utility market. “There are no new variants being added, the kinds of vehicles that kept causing the segment to grow with a new Honda HR-V here and a new Jeep Renegade there. Subcompact crossovers accounted for 7.4 percent of the SUV/CUV market in the first quarter of 2017, on par with their market share a year ago.”

As it seeks volume (and profit) growth, Kerssemakers said that Volvo’s focus remains on “bread-and-butter” models. Coupes and convertibles — for the time being, anyway— aren’t of much interest to the automaker, he added.

[Image: Volvo]

#Crossovers #FutureModels #ProductPlanning #SubcompactCars #SubcompactCrossovers #Volvo #Volvo20-series

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 13 comments

SCE to AUX on Apr 19, 2017

"...the resurgent Volvo" Hmm. US sales are down 18% YTD this year.

Like Reply
Never_follow on Apr 19, 2017

Bring back the C30. Awesome little car with the T5.

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Steve Biro on Apr 19, 2017
  
  +10. I have always regretted not buying a C30. There was an unwanted year-old leftover at my local dealer going for something like 18K. And because Ford had just sold Volvo to the Chinese, I backed off. Silly and stupid on my part.
  
  Like
- MRF 95 T-Bird on Apr 20, 2017
  
  @Steve Biro Same here. If I was in the market for a pre-owned hot hatch instead of a GTI, or Focus ST I'd put the C30 on the top of my list. I see them in the $10-16k range for the T5 or limited edition Polestar.
  
  Like
- TDIandThen.... on Apr 20, 2017
  
  I would have got a C30 the first time round too but the efficiency was awful. Maybe this time with a turbo three plus electric under the hood? I'd be in if it got even low thirties mpg combined.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).