Nissan Jacks Up 2018 Armada's Price, Cedes Bargain Crown to 2018 Chevrolet Tahoe Custom

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The 2018 Nissan Armada will be priced at $46,795, including destination, when it goes on sale Friday, September 1st; a $700 increase compared with 2016.

While that price increase would have been enough for the Nissan Armada to maintain its position as America’s least costly body-on-frame, full-size SUV, the sudden appearance of the 2018 Chevrolet Tahoe Custom has altered the playing field.

Competitors, not just Nissan but Toyota and Ford as well, didn’t need to give the class-leading Chevrolet even more capacity to dominate the category. But now the best seller is also the bargain of the bunch, and by a noticeable margin.

Through the first seven months of 2017, Chevrolet Tahoe sales had risen less than one half of one percent in a category that was up 7 percent. Despite limited growth, however, the Tahoe and its GM cohorts (the long-wheelbase Suburban and Tahoe/Suburban twins from GMC) own 67 percent of the segment so far this year.

Granted, that’s down from 72 percent a year ago. Where did that chunk of GM full-size SUV market share go?

To the Nissan Armada, no longer an SUVified Nissan Titan but an Americanized Nissan Patrol. Armada sales nearly tripled to 16,632 units so far this year. That’s still a low total by the standards of GM and Ford competition, but enough to almost certainly make 2017 the best year for U.S. Armada sales in a decade.

SUVJuly 2017July 2016% Change2017 YTD2016 YTD% ChangeChevrolet Tahoe6,8248,431-19.1%51,83351,6520.4%Ford Expedition3,6175,963-39.3%34,73433,7213.0%Chevrolet Suburban3,3925,055-32.9%28,29527,9701.2%GMC Yukon4,3704,677-6.6%23,89724,705-3.3%GMC Yukon XL2,7802,937-5.3%17,41017,1351.6%Nissan Armada2,477606309%16,6325,857184%Toyota Sequoia9631,025-6.0%7,1747,322-2.0%Total24,42328,694-14.9%179,975168,3626.9%

Part of the Armada’s marketing advantage for the 2017 model year was a comparatively low MSRP. The 2017 Armada’s $46,095 SV 2WD sticker represented a $2,415 savings, at least before ample discounts are applied, compared with the 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe LS 2WD.

But accompanying the Armada’s $700 price increase is a $3,750 price chop of the base Tahoe, now referred to as the Tahoe Custom. The 2017 Toyota Sequoia, meanwhile, stickers from $49,595. Ford’s new 2018 Expedition, excluding the fleet-only XL, starts at $52,890. GMC hasn’t yet released 2018 Yukon pricing, but it’s expected to continue to hover around the $50K mark.

Four-wheel drive is a $2,900 option on the 2018 Nissan Armada, though rear-wheel drive is standard on all three trim levels. Armada SLs start at $51,545. The Armada Platinum 4WD tops out at $62,785 before any options are added. All Armadas now include NissanConnect Services; the Armada Platinum now includes a Cadillac-like Intelligent Rear View Mirror with a rear-mounted camera projecting images onto an LCD monitor in the rearview mirror.

[Images: Nissan, General Motors]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Brn Brn on Aug 30, 2017

    Wow, prices are higher than I expected.

  • Cbrworm Cbrworm on Aug 31, 2017

    Huh. I've never seen one of these in real life, but there are dozens of the Infiniti version sitting in my parking lot right now. The Armada looks better to me, and I think that it is only slightly more than half the price of the Infiniti one.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next