FCA Announces Pricing for the '840 Horsepower' Dodge Challenger SRT Demon

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Dodge announced pricing for the 2018 Challenger SRT Demon today — not that it matters, as dealers will do everything in their powers to not adhere to its MSRP. However, the starting point for their gouging occurs at $84,995, which includes the gas guzzler tax but not a $1,095 destination fee.

The good news is there are loads of optional extras that only cost a dollar, even though those are gimmick prices already rolled into the vehicle’s initial value. That won’t make it any less fun when you tell your neighbor about it, right before you wrap your freshly minted Demon in a car cover and store it for eternity.

Let’s get into what an extra dollar can get you on this 840-horsepower garage queen!

For every extra dollar you spend, Dodge will install each of the following items: one leather front passenger seat, a rear leather bench, a carpeted trunk, and a serialized “Demon Crate” tool chest valued at $6,140.

Most people will probably splurge and shell out the four bucks for the whole shebang for the one Sunday per summer they take the whole family to the local putt-putt. However, if you’re only interested in drag racing, you really only want the tool chest. Of course, the Demon’s 9.65-second quarter-mile time and 140 mph trap speed means you’ll be shelling out a lot more than that for an NHRA certified roll cage. You’ll also want that tool chest because the supercharged 6.2-liter V8 only makes 808 horsepower without it.

The kit includes those skinny front-runner drag wheels, a powertrain control module, conical performance air filter, valve stems, additional instrument panel controls, a jack, trunk case, and a passenger mirror block-off plate — along with a handful of useful Demon-branded tools. The car won’t generate the claimed 840 hp and 770 lb-ft of torque until you’ve done some modifications (and filled up on 100 octane fuel).

Dodge says that it’s aware the ludicrously fast muscle car isn’t providing 1998 Toyota Corolla levels of value, but suggests prospective buyers see it as more of an investment.

“Eighty-five thousand dollars is not just a number in a business case to Dodge; we know it’s a lot of money and a significant up-charge over a Challenger Hellcat,” said Tim Kuniskis, FCA’s head of passenger cars. “We worked very hard to build as much value into the Challenger SRT Demon as possible — features, performance and exclusivity that simply can’t be duplicated with a goal of maintaining, and possibly even growing, as much future value as possible.”

That’s a fair point and Dodge is offering certain “optional extras” at a dollar each. However, the term value is malleable and we’re quickly reminded of that when we look at some of the other options available on the Demon. If you want to upgrade the interior, it’s $1,595 for a “Leather Front Seat Group” that includes things like heated front seats, a heated steering wheel, added detailing, and nicer floor mats. If you don’t want leather, you can pay $995 for heated and cooled cloth seats and an upgraded 18-speaker Harmon/Kardon audio setup. There is also a $2,495 option for alcantara, additional comfort features, and that same sound system.

We’re only getting started here. Red seat belts are about $200 extra, $1,995 is the price tag for a black hood (which you’ll obviously want), and the full “Black Satin Graphics Package” is $3,495. Interested in a sunroof? It’s almost $5,000. Granted, in 40 years you might have one of a handful of already rare cars that actually has one equipped — but that’ll only be because most people don’t want to add roof weight to their drag strip-focused hot rod.

Color options are typical Challenger. Choices include B5 Blue, Billet Silver, Destroyer Grey, F8 Green, Go Mango, Granite Crystal, Indigo Blue, Maximum Steel, Octane Red, Pitch Black, Plum Crazy, Redline, TorRed, White Knuckle and Yellow Jacket. Some of those colors won’t be available until later in the model’s one-year lifespan.

The Challenger SRT Demon is covered by FCA US LLC’s factory warranty, which includes a three-year/36,000-mile limited vehicle warranty and a five-year/60,000-mile limited powertrain coverage. Owners also receive a full-day training session at Bob Bondurant School of High-performance Driving — presumably to prevent on-road tragedies when dad decides to show off.

Production of the limited-edition Dodge Challenger SRT Demon begins later this summer at FCA’s Brampton, Ontario assembly plant. This year, and only this year, 3,000 vehicles will head for the United States, with the remaining 300 reserved for Canada. Deliveries to dealers will begin in the fall.

[Images: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 26 comments
  • Arach Arach on May 24, 2017

    If I thought I could buy one (wait list is insane), I'd seriously consider one. That price is not bad for what you get here... Not bad at all. I was expecting it to be at least another 15k.

    • IHateCars IHateCars on May 24, 2017

      I doubt that you'll be able to find one under $100K and they'll all be snatched up. If I had the scratch.....absolutely!

  • Sgeffe Sgeffe on May 26, 2017

    A "passenger mirror block-off plate?" They provide instructions for this, I trust?! I could see a ham-fisted mirror-ectomy resulting in a confused BCAN-controller fail-safing the car into limp-home mode at a very inopportune time -- like an eighth of a mile down the strip at full-song!

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next