QOTD: We've (Not) Got the Power, So Where Should It Go?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

On Sunday, Matt brought you the story of Toyota’s latest plan to ditch its longstanding reputation for building boring yet reliable cars — a problem some quality deficient automakers would kill for.

The brand has recently bolstered its efforts to draw its design direction away from the realm of “safe” and into the neighborhood of edgy, funky, and just maybe, controversial. (How about that new Camry’s face, eh? Hmmm…) Still, design doesn’t equal driving thrills. Visual excitement doesn’t quicken the pulse after you’ve slipped behind the wheel.

To this end, Toyota appears ready to launch a performance line similar to Lexus’ F sub-brand. The automaker known for (very successfully) playing it safe may let its hair down. And not a moment too soon, some might say. While the upcoming 2018 Camry gains significant standard power from Toyota’s four-cylinder engineering prowess, vehicles like the C-HR crossover, Corolla, Corolla iM, and other models aren’t exactly causing heart palpitations on test drives (or any other drives, for that matter).

Let’s pick up that syringe filled with muscle enhancer, shall we?

If Toyota’s Yaris GRMN (Gazoo Racing Masters of Nürburgring) hot hatch shows us, it’s that the brand’s racing division is capable of massaging a pedestrian commuter car into a decent performer. Assuming it makes the trek to North America, no one’s kicking sand in this Yaris’ face.

So, if Toyota takes a page from, say, Nissan’s book — NISMOing all the things, as it were — what models need pumping up the most? There’s no shortage of choice. The rear-drive 86 2+2 sports coupe (formerly the Scion FR-S) has been forever saddled with a “nice effort, but needs more grunt” reputation. Its sales reflect it.

I’d argue, and many would agree, that the C-HR is in desperate need for more ponies, as well as a way to channel any power to the rear axle. Having a certified sports car in your stable’s nice, but what models actually sell these days? It’s crossovers all the way. Meanwhile, the Corolla and its five-door sibling are liable to break their wrists trying to punch through wet Kleenex.

Cover the low end of the market, I say. Offer hot variants across the compact class — both crossovers and passenger cars.

What say you, Best and Brightest?

[Image: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
  • Namesakeone Yes, for two reasons: The idea of a robot making decisions based on algorithms does not seem to be in anyone's best interest, and the thought of trucking companies salivating over using a computer to replace the salary of a human driver means a lot more people in the unemployment lines.
  • Bd2 Powertrain reliability of Boxer engines is always questionable. I'll never understand why Subaru held onto them for so long. Smartstream is a solid engine platform as is the Veracruz 3.8L V6.
  • SPPPP I suppose I am afraid of autonomous cars in a certain sense. I prefer to drive myself when I go places. If I ride as a passenger in another driver's car, I can see if that person looks alert and fit for purpose. If that person seems likely to crash, I can intervene, and attempt to bring them back to attention. If there is no human driver, there will probably be no warning signs of an impending crash.But this is less significant than the over-arching fear of humans using autonomous driving as a tool to disempower and devalue other humans. As each generation "can't be trusted" with more and more things, we seem to be turning more passive and infantile. I fear that it will weaken our society and make it more prone to exploitation from within, and/or conquest from the outside.
  • JMII Based on the human drivers I encounter everyday I'll happily take my chances with a computer at the wheel.The highway driver assist system on my Santa Cruz is great, it can self drive perfectly in about 90% of situations. However that other 10% requires you to be in control and make decisions. I feel this is the problem with an AI driving a car, there are times when due to road construction, weather conditions or other drivers when only a human will know what to do.
Next