Will They or Won't They? Questions Remain About Silverado/Sierra Production in Oshawa

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

General Motors is spending billions to upgrade certain factories, prepping them to build the next-generation Silverado and Sierra. As part of a four-year contract agreed to in September 2016, $310 million was invested in Oshawa’s so-called consolidated line so that it could handle truck production.

Now, Automotive News is reporting that while the Canadian plant may indeed be building trucks, it won’t be the snazzy new ones set to hit dealer lots for the 2019 model year. Instead, Oshawa will simply paint and perform final assembly of the outgoing 2018 trucks.

“Oshawa will be building current model pickups that helps us meet customer demand while we are in transition to next-generation pickups,” GM Canada spokeswoman Jennifer Wright told Automotive News Canada. “This strategy will help us meet customer demand as we transition our production and introduce our exciting new models into the market starting later in 2018. The length of the program in Oshawa will be dependent on market demand.”

Oh dear. If one were to be particularly unkind, they might suggest that GM played the old switcheroo on Oshawa, promising trucks but not specifying which exact ones. The statement saying the timeframe for Oshawa truck production is dependent on demand for the old model should sound several alarm bells and klaxons for anyone with an active interest in that plant’s production of vehicles.

This is particularly perplexing news, given GM documentation dated just last week seemed to indicate that the next-generation Silverado and Sierra were slated to be built in the Great White North. The 2019 Silverado pickups are listed as having a “Region of Build” in both the United States and Canada. Looking more closely, the document reveals this information pertains to the 2500 and 3500 Heavy Duty series of trucks. It also coughs up details about specific plant locations: Flint and Fort Wayne are listed in addition to the Canadian facility of “Oshawa

Those lame-duck 1500 series trucks, now known as the Silverado Legacy and Sierra Limited, have only a single country – Canada – listed under its Region of Build. The plant location is specified as “Oshawa In a telling find, high-zoot trims (Chevy’s High Country & GMC’s SLT and Denali) have vanished from the old-style pickups. The magnificent 6.2-liter V8 is gone, too.

A quick reminder: for vehicle built on North American soil, a VIN starting with 1, 4, or 5 denote an American assembled vehicle. The digit 2 is reserved for machines rolling out of Canadian plants, and a 3 means the rig was Hecho en Mexico.

GM’s VIN Standard document is full of little tidbits, including a reminder that the Cadillac CT6 includes China’s Jinqiao East plant in its Region of Build in addition to the United States facility of Detroit Hamtramck.

The entire filing, all 54 pages of it, can be found here.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Dec 22, 2017

    I agree this is truly troubling and it looks like GM is 'hedging their bets'. With the relief GM obtained via bankruptcy regarding its American retirees' costs, not having to provide medical care for their Canadian workers/retirees (due to universal medical care) is no longer the same massive cost savings. And nobody knows which way NAFTA will go or what might replace it. So $310 million is small potatoes when they can crank out a bunch of legacy vehicles for a couple of years. After that what happens in Oshawa is anyone's guess?

  • FreedMike FreedMike on Dec 22, 2017

    Am I wrong, or did I *NOT* see any Silverados or Sierras being made in Mexico on that document?

  • Shipwright As my Avatar shows I had an '08 GT 500, Grabber Orange convertible. I now own a '12 GT 500 Kona Blue coupe.
  • ArialATOMV8 I tend to prefer more amusing colors when picking out a car (if possible). My 2017 Lexus RX is painted in a Nightfall Mica (Dark Blue) and I really dig the look. In the dealership it stands out compared to the regular tame blacks, silvers and whites. Soon I may be at the point to afford a new car and when I do, I'll do my part and spec/hunt for an allocation of a vibrant color.
  • Tassos Tim is not that good with colors.The bright "pink" is not pink, but FUCHSIA. Both colors may look good on a woman's sweater, but not on steel panels.
  • Tassos While I was a very satisfied owner of a much earlier Accord COupe 5 speed (a 1990 I owned from 1994 to 2016), I don't like the exterior styling of this one so much, in fact the 2017 sedan looks better. Or maybe it sucks in white. The interior of my 1990 was very high quality, this one looks so-so. The 157 k miles were probably easy highway miles. Still, Hondas are not Toyotas, and I remember the same service (like timing belt replacement) back then cost TWICE for an Accord than for a Camry. Add to this that it has the accursed CVT, and it's a no. Not that I am in the market for a cheap econobox anyway.
  • 3-On-The-Tree My 2009 C6 corvette in black looks great when it’s all washed and waxed but after driving down my 1.3 mile long dirt road it’s a dust magnet. I like white because dust doesn’t how up easily. Both my current 2021 Tundra and previous 2014 Ford F-150 3.5L Ecobomb are white
Next