2018 Cadillac CTS-V Glacier Metallic Edition Celebrates Cadillac's 115th, Commands a $15,895 Premium

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The production run for the 2018 Cadillac CTS-V Glacier Metallic Edition, set to take place in 2017 on behalf of the 2018 model year, will be limited to a scant 115 units to celebrate Cadillac’s 115th anniversary.

Sounding like the proper name for a glitzy Jeep Grand Cherokee, the CTS-V Glacier Metallic Edition operates with the same 640-horsepower supercharged 6.2-liter V8 of less costly CTS-Vs, but Cadillac demands $15,895 for the privilege.

That brings the CTS-V Glacier Metallic Edition’s price up to $103,885 including destination, a lofty sum for a performance-oriented Cadillac.

Yet the 2018 Cadillac CTS-V GME — you can’t expect us to type Glacier Metallic Edition every time, not when Cadillac alternatively calls it “smoky light gray” — is more than just an anniversary paint job. The CTS-V GME still undercuts the Mercedes-AMG E63 S and Audi RS7 and is slathered with typically optional equipment.

In fact, if you add all of the 115th anniversary edition CTS-V’s standard equipment (special paint aside) to a regular 2017 Cadillac CTS-V, you end up with a $103,160 sticker — only $725 less than the anniversary edition car. That’s roughly the dollar difference of a premium coat of paint.

Ah, so the MSRP isn’t that frightening. Not when you consider standard fitment of the carbon fiber front splitter, hood vent, rear spoiler, and rear diffuser. Plus the luxury package’s tri-zone climate control, heated rear seats, and rear camera mirror. And the inclusion of $2,300 Recaro seats, a $1,600 performance data and video recorder, and the $1,450 panoramic sunroof. Also: the $595 Brembo brake calipers.

Expensive cars are expensive. Expensive cars with extra options, included on the CTS-V GME as standard equipment, are more expensive.

Yet the CTS-V remains a performance bargain by the standards of its classmates.

It also continues to look like designers who wanted to work on the TVR T350T and Mercedes-Benz’s AMG GLA43 Edition 1 boarded Cadillac’s design ship, committed successful acts of mutiny, and turned the CTS into GM’s luxury sedan version of the Honda Civic Type R.

On the whole, U.S. sales of the Cadillac CTS are tanking. Through 2017’s first seven months, CTS volume is down 37 percent to only 5,845 units, placing the CTS on track for its lowest-volume year in history. By a wide margin.

[Image: General Motors]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next